🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, expanding to include gatherings where African descendants are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The period has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the month is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A effort to remove African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how little it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an infrastructure that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the past when it ignores the current situation of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.