🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.