🔗 Share this article

Itranspired he could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive an important continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, undermining the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim took on Jason Wilcox and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been easy, based on his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over System & Ideology

For example, this was the director who being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade him to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on the sporting director we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Order: Executives Above Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not creating the food, but still finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the elevation of a privileged elite who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Hire the system coach only to dismiss them for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later discard them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.